AN IDEA OF IMPROVISATION
AS AN ALGORITHM OF THE BLUES
Although this
ain’t the ballad
of a wounded boy,
tonight a needle descends
into a record’s black skin
like a dove winging
into a window
until you may hear—
in the alto horn’s tone—
an extra stress
on the moan in “Testimony.”
But listen—no matter
how high the moon—
could even Charlie Parker
chart the burdens of a bird
into “Ornithology”
especially if
he never leaves
his wife & infant son
the way autumn
might litter a lawn?
Let’s be clear—
blues may be nothing
he ever loved or nothing
that ever loved him,
just some jive frequencies
of water or sky, or
a bright bandanna
tied across his brow.
But if nothing aqua
ever lived in his lungs
how could a moaned “No”
connect his breath
to epistemology?
Joy claims birdsong proves
the futility of words
and what human could improve
its contrafactual flow?
Some nights
even the moon appears
to take notes
as Parker makes a fractal
of their phrase—
then flattens & sharpens
one eighth into a swollen vein.
This paradox may
remain hypodermic,
a beaked flame of bird-speak
beneath a spoon’s black skin,
but let’s say the song ain’t over.
I don’t know why
some cats try to pull
from Parker’s tone
as much wit as Witness,
while others say the warp
& woof of the Blues
weaves hip bandannas
to flag down the yellow taxis
of square axioms.
But I do know
that many claim
“Bird lives”
in this address
of ghost notes
unexpected as ketchup
on corn flakes.
Of course imagination
sometimes flares
into an act of faith
and perhaps even the hands
of an abandoned boy
might find themselves
waving outside a window
as Bird mines his alto’s
phonographic memory—
which cannot choose
what it may or may not save.
Could the tiny eyes
of a baby bird
ever drive him
to try to push
the square pegs
of an arpeggio
into a cobalt whole?
“Take a phrase,
then fracture it”—
he reciphers
the solo to say
until even the dirge
of a wounded dove
might fray into ontology—
but still not free
his slender hands
to twist the band
into a bandage.
No comments:
Post a Comment