A CRY OF IMPROVISATION AS AN ALGORITHM OF THE BLUES
Although this
ain’t the ballad
of a wounded boy,
tonight a needle
descends into
a record’s black skin—
the beak of a dove
winging into a window—
until we hear
in the alto horn
extra stress
in his moan of “Testimony.”
But listen—no matter
how high the moon—
could even Charlie Parker
chart the true burdens of birds
into “Ornithology”?
Even if in other takes
Yardbird stays—
and doesn’t leave
his wife & infant son
as autumn
litters a lawn,
could the eyes
of a chirping bird
ever urge
the square pegs
of his arpeggios
into a cobalt whole?
Let’s be clear—
blues ain‘t nothing
he loves or nothing
that ever loved him,
just some jive frequencies
of water, or sky, or
a type of bandanna
tied across his brow.
But if nothing aqua
tinted his lungs
could a moaned “No”
ever twist his breath
into epistemology?
Joy claims birdsong proves
the futility of words
since what human could improve
its contrafactual flow?
Some nights
even the moon appears
to take notes
as Parker breaks a fractal
off their phrase—
then flattens & sharpens
one eighth into a swollen vein.
This paradox feels hypodermic,
a beaked flame of bird-speak
beneath a spoon’s burned skin,
but let’s say the song ain’t over.
I don’t know why
some cats try to pull
from Parker’s tone
as much wit as Witness,
while some want the warp
& woof of the Blues
to make a square bandanna
for flagging down the yellow taxis
of hip axioms.
But I do know
how many claim
“Bird lives”
in this address
of ghost notes
unexpected as ketchup
on corn flakes.
Of course imagination
can flare into a faith
so even the hands
of an abandoned boy
could be seen waving
outside the window
while Bird mines a horn’s
phonographic memory—
which cannot choose
what it does or doesn’t save.
“Take a phrase,
then fracture it”—
he might recipher
his solo to say
until even the ballad
of a wounded dove
seems to resolve
into ontology—
but does that free
two slender hands
to bend the band
into a bandage?
No comments:
Post a Comment