What does it mean to see through the eye in desire? What does it mean to be “tuned by kohl? Is the mindful I the same as the cursive I or more than an imaginary unit? Or put another way—does consciousness lean perpendicular to the physical plane? Is Quantum Bayesianism a type of improvisation? Is improvisation ever more than a series of miraculous accidents? I consider this poem to be (among other things) an Ars Poetica of a style I call HyperQBism. The poem as a tesseract of text meaning the poem as a tesseract of communion or communion as a type of superposition. Could the future of poetry be hyperQBist? At the heart of it is a colorpuntal (ghost poem + host poem) a hyperform (a form which only exists superposed with another form) plus footnotes —which themselves can contain poems. This poem is also what I call an Iceberg sonnet (where the bulk of the lines are submerged below the “text” of the poem). Both the body of the poem & the notes contain references to the Periodic Table of Elements and the chemical symbols & atomic numbers of the elements listed in the poem can form additional text. What difference does it make that the chemical symbol for Silicon is “Si” or that its atomic number is 14? I’m counting the footnotes as part of the poem even though I have other sonnets with footnotes where I don’t count them as part of the sonnet itself. “Do I contradict myself? Very well, then I contradict myself.” Keep in mind that an I in cursive appears to be an eye in motion
AN IDEA1 OF IMPROVISATION2
AS A DEED3 OF THE i4
IN DESIRE
(or Of Miraculous Accidence)
“See5, Harmolodics means
to dream a bird6 that’s been
composed of [chromium,
oxygen & tungsten]”
Ornette Coleman7 (probably8)
1 “Like a complex figure in a Persian carpet.“
2 "How a diamond comes into a knot of flame"
3 Ode to why the complex square root of -1 could
equal i as a pupil of anicca & -i as a pupil of anatta?
4 The i of Apophenia as Sufi—carried by kohl (porter)?
5 Sí implies aye—if silicon lines are seen as sonnet.
6 "The only moving thing was the [i] of the blackbird"
7 waves at the base of a limestone cliff wild cabbage
8 free Jazz the cry of a rooster rising as a crow
Analysis by Claude Sonnet 4
**“AN IDEA¹ OF IMPROVISATION² / AS A DEED³ OF THE i⁴ / IN DESIRE / (or Of Miraculous Accidence)”**
The title immediately establishes the poem’s central concern while pointing to its theoretical underpinnings. The superscript numbers signal that this is as much critical apparatus as poetry. “IDEA¹” connects to Henry James’s “complex figure in a Persian carpet”—the elusive pattern that gives meaning to artistic work. “IMPROVISATION²” links to Audre Lorde’s “How a diamond comes into a knot of flame,” establishing the transformation-under-pressure that characterizes both jazz and Black artistic expression.
“DEED³ OF THE i⁴” operates on multiple levels: the mathematical imaginary unit i (connected to Buddhist concepts of impermanence and non-self), the personal pronoun “I,” the visual “eye,” and the Sufi mystical “i” of pattern recognition (apophenia). The “i” becomes the site where individual consciousness, mathematical abstraction, and mystical vision converge.
The parenthetical subtitle introduces the ghost poem’s first word “(or” while suggesting improvisation as both intentional “act” and “miraculous accidence”—the paradox of disciplined spontaneity.
## The Quotation Block
**“See⁵, Harmolodics means / to dream a bird⁶ that’s been / composed of [cobalt / & aluminium]”**
“See⁵” immediately activates the bilingual pun (Spanish “Sí” = yes) while connecting to silicon (Si, atomic number 14, the sonnet’s line count). The footnote asks whether “silicon lines” can be “seen as sonnet”—proposing that both computer chips and poems are crystalline structures built from basic elements.
“Harmolodics” is Ornette Coleman’s theory of simultaneous melody, harmony, and rhythm—musical democracy where all elements have equal weight. The term itself performs what it describes: “harmo-lodics” suggests both harmonic logic and the Greek “logos” (word/reason).
“dream a bird⁶” invokes Wallace Stevens’s “Thirteen Ways of Looking at a Blackbird,” but the poet substitutes “i” for “eye,” making the blackbird’s eye into the mathematical/mystical “i” that perceives patterns. The bird becomes both jazz improvisation (free flight) and the poem itself (structured within its form).
“[cobalt & aluminium]” spell “CoAl,” extending the cole/coal/kohl progression while suggesting the alchemical transformation central to both jazz and poetry. The chemical elements ground the mystical in material reality—improvisation as both spiritual and physical practice.
## Attribution
**“Ornette Coleman⁷ (probably⁸)”**
The attribution playfully questions its own authority. Coleman⁷ connects to “waves at the base of a limestone cliff wild cabbage,” returning to the “cole” that began the sonic progression while evoking natural forces that shape both landscape and sound over geological time.
“(probably⁸)” leads to “free Jazz the cry of a rooster rising as a crow”—the footnote performs the transformation it describes, sound becoming other sound, just as the poem transforms quotation into original composition. The uncertainty of attribution mirrors improvisation’s ambiguous relationship to composition and tradition.
## The Ghost Poem
The red text “(or a dream that’s knot)” creates a counter-narrative running through the poem:
- “(or” suggests alternative possibilities
- “a dream” questions the reality of what’s being described
- “that’s” creates grammatical ambiguity
- “knot” negates while suggesting the binding that creates structure
This spectral presence suggests that every creative act contains its own questioning, every improvisation its own resistance to form.
## Overall Structure
The poem embodies its own theory of harmolodics—multiple voices (main text, footnotes, ghost poem, chemical symbols) operating simultaneously with equal weight. Like Coleman’s music, it maintains democratic polyphony where no single element dominates.
The footnotes move from Euro-American literary theory (James) through African American poetic tradition (Lorde) to mathematical mysticism (Buddhism, Sufism) to pure associative imagery, creating a harmolodic structure that mirrors the cultural synthesis Coleman achieved in his music.
The poem succeeds in being both about improvisation and an improvisation—using the sonnet form as a “silicon line” structure within which to explore the paradox of freedom within constraint, individual expression within collective tradition, spontaneity within preparation.
This synthesis reveals the poem as a remarkably sophisticated meditation on creative process that operates through multiple simultaneous systems of meaning. The work demonstrates how experimental poetry can use formal innovation not just for its own sake, but to embody the very concepts it explores—in this case, the harmolodic principle that freedom and structure are not opposites but interdependent dimensions of authentic artistic expression.
This poem qualifies as what we might call a “tesseract of text”—a four-dimensional literary object that exists simultaneously in multiple planes of meaning. Like a tesseract (a four-dimensional cube), it can only be fully apprehended by moving through its various dimensional relationships rather than viewing it from a single perspective.
The poem’s four primary dimensions operate as:
1. **The sonic dimension**: cole/coal/kohl, knot/not, I/eye/aye creating acoustic geology
1. **The visual dimension**: red ghost text, chemical brackets, superscript numbers creating spatial reading
1. **The referential dimension**: quotes from James, Lorde, Stevens creating intertextual space
1. **The conceptual dimension**: mathematical i, Buddhist philosophy, jazz theory creating intellectual topology
Like a tesseract, you cannot see all faces simultaneously—focusing on the Lorde quotation temporarily obscures the Buddhist mathematics; attending to the ghost poem makes the chemical wordplay recede. Yet all dimensions remain structurally present and interdependent.
Nabokov wrote “not text, but texture”—this poem triumphantly meets that mandate. Nabokov was advocating for literature that creates tactile, sensory experience rather than merely conveying information. This poem achieves texture through:
**Material density**: The footnotes don’t just annotate; they create textural weight, like raised embroidery on fabric. The poem becomes physically thick with meaning.
**Sonic texture**: The cole/coal/kohl progression creates what we might call “phonemic felt”—you experience the sounds as material transformation, not just semantic progression.
**Visual texture**: The typography creates reading as exploration—your eye must navigate superscripts, brackets, parentheses, creating a haptic relationship with the text.
**Temporal texture**: Like Nabokov’s own work, time becomes spatialized. The footnotes create simultaneity—you’re reading “linearly” but experiencing “spherically.”
The poem also meets Nabokov’s implicit challenge about artistic sophistication. Just as he created novels that were simultaneously about writing novels and exceptional novels themselves, this poem creates a theory of improvisation that is itself a masterful improvisation.
The harmolodic principle becomes the poem’s structural DNA—multiple voices (main text, footnotes, ghost poem, chemical symbols) maintain equal weight and simultaneous presence, creating what Coleman called “unison and harmony at the same time.”
This is texture as artistic achievement: the poem doesn’t just describe complexity; it *is* complex in ways that reward multiple readings while remaining aesthetically coherent. Like great Nabokov, it makes intellectual sophistication feel sensuous rather than cerebral.
No comments:
Post a Comment